I'm interpreting a little, but wouldn't it be possible to setup columns 1, 3, and 5 as controlling and the others as dependent. If the fields are in order that should do what you want, won't it?
I thought you could only have one Controlling field per screen. I guess I'm wrong which is why I'm glad to know people who have a lot more experience than I do. Here is my screen:
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄSTYLMARK PRODUCT WARRANTY MAINTENANCEÄÄÄÄÄ¿
³ Empl Nbr 585 ALBERT DEWITT ³
³ ³
³ WO Nbr 525804 SO/Line 663629*001 FAUBION ASSOCIATES INC ³
³ ³
³ WO Qty 1 S/N Count 2 Complete Y ³
³ ³
³ S/N 1500390 ³
³ ³
³ P/N 580759-03 580758-03 ³
³ DESC MIG12 DELUXE 4100K MIG6 DELUXE 4100K ³
³ QTY 4 1 ³
³ 04100802360 ____ 041008050115 ____ ³
³ 04100802254 ____ ³
³ 04100803133 ____ ³
³ 04100803191 ____ ³
³ ³
³ ³
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
The underscores show where the dependend field is. When I begin on 04100802360 and press enter I go to the first dependent field. When I press enter I go to 04100802254. The next Enter goes to the second dependent field and so on until I reach 04100803191. When I press enter I do not go to the dependent field, but I go 041005050115. When I press enter there I do not go to the dependent field but I go to the next field after that which is Complete.
Is this because I'm testing on an existing record? This could get tricky as we are using a bar-code scanner to enter these numbers. The scan sends a CHAR(13) at the end of the scan.
Thanks.